Vibe coding has quickly moved from hobbyist side-projects to a viable enterprise strategy, offering a potential blueprint for accelerating product development. The method bypasses the typical enterprise gauntlet of sprints and approvals, allowing new concepts to be prototyped and tested in days rather than months. It’s a return to the kind of agility most teams lost as their tech stacks and processes scaled up, and it’s redefining what speed actually looks like in modern product development.
Capulet Poehner has spent over 16 years shaping digital products at companies like Best Buy and Amazon, and he recently put vibe coding into practice. In a two-day sprint with a "small, scrappy team" of AIs, he built a lightweight web game prototype on an old laptop. The value wasn’t the prototype itself, but the return to that early-web feeling when small teams could move quickly and test ideas without friction. And for Poehner, that’s the point. It's less about building faster and more about learning faster. But it all comes back to data.
"Speed only matters if the data is there to guide the next step. You need a data-first mindset from the start, because the goal is not simply to launch, it's to understand what the data reveals. Too many teams ship without a real capture strategy, which leaves product managers operating blind," says Poehner. He argues that this shift, more than rapid prototyping itself, is what determines whether vibe coding becomes a genuine accelerator inside the enterprise.
Fast-forward feedback: A data-first approach also accelerates the customer feedback loop, Poehner explains. "You can give a prototype to users, assemble the data, and feed it to an AI. I'm confident it would return strategic recommendations in minutes. That's the big challenge in any space: getting data and knowing what to do next. What AI really accelerates is that whole customer feedback loop."
Meanwhile, an AI-driven approach like this directly addresses a common frustration in enterprise development: the risk of burning months of budget on a full engineering cycle to test a single idea.
In the fast lane: In contrast, Poehner’s experiment points to a new way forward. "Teams often stall when a promising idea is estimated at four weeks of work. But what if it only required two days with a product manager and an AI?" he suggests. "You could validate a concept before a full engineering team even gets involved."
Sandbox, not server: One practical limitation of the method, however, is that it is not equipped to navigate the intricacies of legacy backends or secure customer data. "As far as the near future goes, this approach is perfect for a team operating in an ambiguous space with a specific goal," Poehner explains. "It would not, however, work for a team that's responsible for the back-end pricing code that powers an entire retail website."
Looking forward, Poehner predicts a provocative future that could reshape the foundations of product leadership. He describes an approaching "flip" where AI will eventually design human experiences better than humans can. "There will come a time, potentially in our lifetimes, where AI will develop entire systems that serve millions of people better than anything a human could ever create," he says.
Poehner believes the shift will redefine the role of product leaders. Instead of serving as producers of requirements, they will become judges of quality in an environment flooded with machine-generated output. AI, he notes, doesn’t introduce sloppy content so much as amplify it by orders of magnitude, which raises a harder question for enterprises: how to manage the sheer volume. Despite the risks, he still urges teams to engage. "I have some optimism," he says, "but we have to be really careful."